AllBugsFeaturesChangelogSearchNew post
Sign in with Fluxer
Features

Edit history

Earlier versions of Fund anti-predator sting operations instead of age verification, newest first.

Current version | Edited by Rex
Changes
Basically, to actually protect kids, just... go after the people who want to hurt kids.Removed: ### Notes (optional)Removed: Removed: _No response_Removed: Removed: ### ChecksRemoved: Removed: - ☑ I searched for existing discussions and didn't find a duplicate.Removed:
Show

Fund anti-predator sting operations instead of age verification

Problem

In theory, this platform is vulnerable to developing the same sort of dark child-molesting underbelly as Discord and Roblox.

Proposed solution

Dedicate a small fraction of revenue (Maybe 0.5%?) to funding anti-predator sting operations on Fluxer (what Schlep was doing on Roblox before the pedos banned him is a good example). Such sting operations are effective at catching predators, while also being highly unlikely to snare anyone remotely decent, and not requiring the collection of identifying information. In addition, it being known that Fluxer funds sting operations on the platform will deter a subset of sexual predators from joining. Basically, to actually protect kids, just... go after the people who want to hurt kids.
Edited by Rex
Changes
Removed: proposal to pre-emptively remove predators without use of age verificationAdded: Fund anti-predator sting operations instead of age verification### Problem
Show

Fund anti-predator sting operations instead of age verification

Problem

In theory, this platform is vulnerable to developing the same sort of dark child-molesting underbelly as Discord and Roblox.

Proposed solution

Dedicate a small fraction of revenue (Maybe 0.5%?) to funding anti-predator sting operations on Fluxer (what Schlep was doing on Roblox before the pedos banned him is a good example). Such sting operations are effective at catching predators, while also being highly unlikely to snare anyone remotely decent, and not requiring the collection of identifying information. In addition, it being known that Fluxer funds sting operations on the platform will deter a subset of sexual predators from joining. Basically, to actually protect kids, just... go after the people who want to hurt kids.

Notes (optional)

No response

Checks

  • ☑ I searched for existing discussions and didn't find a duplicate.
Original by Rex
Show

proposal to pre-emptively remove predators without use of age verification

Problem

In theory, this platform is vulnerable to developing the same sort of dark child-molesting underbelly as Discord and Roblox.

Proposed solution

Dedicate a small fraction of revenue (Maybe 0.5%?) to funding anti-predator sting operations on Fluxer (what Schlep was doing on Roblox before the pedos banned him is a good example). Such sting operations are effective at catching predators, while also being highly unlikely to snare anyone remotely decent, and not requiring the collection of identifying information. In addition, it being known that Fluxer funds sting operations on the platform will deter a subset of sexual predators from joining. Basically, to actually protect kids, just... go after the people who want to hurt kids.

Notes (optional)

No response

Checks

  • ☑ I searched for existing discussions and didn't find a duplicate.