Edit history
Earlier versions of Privacy-Preserving Age Verification via Bank, newest first.
Current version | Edited by Rex
Changes
There is a proven and privacy-preserving method for age verifying an account, and that is to have your bank send Fluxer Platform AB an email stating "this user is an adult and the person they claim to be". This assumes the government making the laws trusts the bank for this purpose.Removed: ### ChecksRemoved: Removed: - ☑ I searched for existing discussions and didn't find a duplicate.Removed:
Show
Privacy-Preserving Age Verification via Bank
Edited by Rex
Changes
There is a proven and privacy-preserving method for age verifying an account, and that is to have your bank send Fluxer Platform AB an email stating "this user is an adult and the person they claim to be". This assumes the government making the laws trusts the bank for this purpose.Removed: ### Notes (optional)Removed: Removed: _No response_Removed: ### Checks
Show
Privacy-Preserving Age Verification via Bank
Problem
Fluxer has no mechanism for proving you're an adult, as all the popular methods are privacy-violating or infeasible for Fluxer to do.Proposed solution
There is a proven and privacy-preserving method for age verifying an account, and that is to have your bank send Fluxer Platform AB an email stating "this user is an adult and the person they claim to be". This assumes the government making the laws trusts the bank for this purpose.Checks
- ☑ I searched for existing discussions and didn't find a duplicate.
Original by Rex
Show
Privacy-Preserving Age Verification via Bank
Problem
Fluxer has no mechanism for proving you're an adult, as all the popular methods are privacy-violating or infeasible for Fluxer to do.Proposed solution
There is a proven and privacy-preserving method for age verifying an account, and that is to have your bank send Fluxer Platform AB an email stating "this user is an adult and the person they claim to be". This assumes the government making the laws trusts the bank for this purpose.Notes (optional)
No responseChecks
- ☑ I searched for existing discussions and didn't find a duplicate.