RexSystem1 voteMerged from #1062originally by @Zambito1 on GitHub1 reply
This may seem obvious to you, but as I am someone who has never moderated a group larger than people I would call my friends, can you elaborate on what the function of "evidence preservation" is? Why do you need that?
I will also say, I saw the discussions in the Visionary chat regarding this, and I think that it's safe to say people were misunderstanding and misrepresenting what your are proposing here. Privacy is a touchy subject, and I err against retention that I consider unecessary, but it is clear that you thought about the privacy side of this (in the disaccociation, explicit representation in the UI). The main issue for me is: why?
RexSystem1 voteMerged from #1062originally by @TheKodeToad on GitHub
Do I misunderstand your suggestion? It seems the idea is that the evidence is preserved by keeping the message publicly available - but in my experience usually you want to delete rule breaking messages
This feature feels like it would just stop the user from deleting their remaining messages (which probably weren't the reason for their ban anyway) after they're banned?
Thread
Comment by @Zambito1
Comment by @TheKodeToad