Summary
Webhooks should have a field likeapplication_id that has the id of the bot/application which made it.
Steps to reproduce
i don't think this has steps to reproduce other than making a webhook and expecting anapplication_id field?Edit history
Earlier versions of webhooks don't have an `application_id` or `user` field, newest first.
Current version | Edited by Rex
Changes
i don't think this has steps to reproduce other than making a webhook and expecting an `application_id` field?Removed: ### Environment (optional)Removed: Removed: _No response_Removed: Removed: ### Logs or screenshots (optional)Removed: Removed: _No response_Removed: Removed: ### ChecksRemoved: Removed: - ☑ I searched for existing issues and didn't find a duplicate.Removed:
Show
webhooks don't have an `application_id` or `user` field
Original by Rex
Show
webhooks don't have an `application_id` or `user` field
Summary
Webhooks should have a field likeapplication_id that has the id of the bot/application which made it.
Steps to reproduce
i don't think this has steps to reproduce other than making a webhook and expecting anapplication_id field?
Environment (optional)
No responseLogs or screenshots (optional)
No responseChecks
- ☑ I searched for existing issues and didn't find a duplicate.