AllBugsFeaturesChangelogSearchNew post
Sign in with Fluxer
Features

Edit history

Earlier versions of Baremetal self-hosting instructions, newest first.

Current version | Edited by Rex
Changes
In that sense, this is a generalisation of https://github.com/orgs/fluxerapp/discussions/1041 which asks about existing reverse proxies.Removed: ### NotesRemoved: Removed: _No response_Removed: Removed: ### ChecksRemoved: Removed: - ☑ I searched existing discussions.Removed:
Show

Baremetal self-hosting instructions

Problem

The upcoming self-hosting instructions look like they will only support container-based installation methods, when baremetal servers are still common.

Proposal

I was wondering whether upcoming self-hosting instructions could also document hosting in non-docker environments. The main use case would be for sysadmins with a partially existing tech stack (DB, livekit instance, reverse proxy) looking to maintain a modular setup. In that sense, this is a generalisation of https://github.com/orgs/fluxerapp/discussions/1041 which asks about existing reverse proxies.
Original by Rex
Show

Baremetal self-hosting instructions

Problem

The upcoming self-hosting instructions look like they will only support container-based installation methods, when baremetal servers are still common.

Proposal

I was wondering whether upcoming self-hosting instructions could also document hosting in non-docker environments. The main use case would be for sysadmins with a partially existing tech stack (DB, livekit instance, reverse proxy) looking to maintain a modular setup. In that sense, this is a generalisation of https://github.com/orgs/fluxerapp/discussions/1041 which asks about existing reverse proxies.

Notes

No response

Checks

  • ☑ I searched existing discussions.