Edit history

Earlier versions of Show more quick reaction emoji on messages, newest first.

Current version | Edited by Rex
Changes
[new-list](https://feedback.fluxer.com/p/1154#f-1053)Removed: ### Notes (optional)Removed: Removed: _No response_Removed: Removed: ### ChecksRemoved: Removed: - ☑ I searched for existing discussions and didn't find a duplicate.Removed:
Show

Show more quick reaction emoji on messages

Problem

Limited choice of instant reaction emotes on messages.

Proposed solution

Small stuff, but I always found Discord's "latest 3" icons less convenient. Considering the abundance of space, I would think increasing the most used emote icons for reacting to a message from 3 to 5 would be ideal, or maybe even make this a configurable option from 3-10. Mockup with 5: new-list
Edited by Rex
Changes
Removed: [ Request ] Increase list of immediate quick reactions/emote choicesAdded: Show more quick reaction emoji on messages### Problem
Show

Show more quick reaction emoji on messages

Problem

Limited choice of instant reaction emotes on messages.

Proposed solution

Small stuff, but I always found Discord's "latest 3" icons less convenient. Considering the abundance of space, I would think increasing the most used emote icons for reacting to a message from 3 to 5 would be ideal, or maybe even make this a configurable option from 3-10. Mockup with 5: new-list

Notes (optional)

No response

Checks

  • ☑ I searched for existing discussions and didn't find a duplicate.
Original by Rex
Show

[ Request ] Increase list of immediate quick reactions/emote choices

Problem

Limited choice of instant reaction emotes on messages.

Proposed solution

Small stuff, but I always found Discord's "latest 3" icons less convenient. Considering the abundance of space, I would think increasing the most used emote icons for reacting to a message from 3 to 5 would be ideal, or maybe even make this a configurable option from 3-10. Mockup with 5: new-list

Notes (optional)

No response

Checks

  • ☑ I searched for existing discussions and didn't find a duplicate.