Comment history
Versions of a comment on [Self-Hosted] SSO provisioned users can do actions they shouldn't, newest first.
Current version | Edited by Rex
Changes
Removed: I would almost make it an option to have this level of enforcement, I agree that [#1254](https://feedback.fluxer.com/p/696) is an issue. But the lockdown to not allow changes be be wanted for a locked down or corporate setting. but not if you are operating it in a social one.Added: I would almost make it an option to have this level of enforcement, I agree that [#696](https://feedback.fluxer.com/p/696) is an issue. But the lockdown to not allow changes be be wanted for a locked down or corporate setting. but not if you are operating it in a social one.
Show
I would almost make it an option to have this level of enforcement, I agree that #696 is an issue. But the lockdown to not allow changes be be wanted for a locked down or corporate setting. but not if you are operating it in a social one.
Original by Rex
Show
I would almost make it an option to have this level of enforcement, I agree that #1254 is an issue. But the lockdown to not allow changes be be wanted for a locked down or corporate setting. but not if you are operating it in a social one.